Scaleway – VC1S

Share test result

Test results for VC1S at Scaleway

Server specs:

2 × Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2550 @ 2.40GHz
2 GB RAM / 48 GB disk space
Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial
Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom

Benchmark results summary:

Disk Read - 34 MB/s
Disk Write - 245 MB/s
Bandwidth - 360.82 MB/s

More: https://serverscope.io/trials/3DP

Share this page


https://serverscope.io/trials/3DP

Server Specs

CPU

2 × Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2550 @ 2.40GHz

CPU Cores

1 × 2394 MHz

RAM

2 GB

Disk

48 GB

Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial

Location

Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom

Benchmark summary

UnixBench

N/A

Disk Read

34 MB/s

Disk Write

245 MB/s

Bandwidth

360.82 Mbit/s

Speedtest

273.11 Mbit/s

UnixBench Score

UnixBench (one CPU)

N/A

Raw Output

gcc -o pgms/arithoh -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Darithoh src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/register -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum="register int" src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/short -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=short src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/int -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=int src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/long -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=long src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/float -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=float src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=double src/arith.c 
gcc -o pgms/hanoi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/hanoi.c 
gcc -o pgms/syscall -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/syscall.c 
gcc -o pgms/context1 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/context1.c 
gcc -o pgms/pipe -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/pipe.c 
src/pipe.c: In function xe2x80x98mainxe2x80x99:
src/pipe.c:52:2: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98pipexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
  pipe(pvec);
  ^
gcc -o pgms/spawn -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/spawn.c 
gcc -o pgms/execl -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/execl.c 
In file included from src/execl.c:34:0:
src/big.c: In function xe2x80x98dummyxe2x80x99:
src/big.c:109:5: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
     freopen("masterlog.00", "a", stderr);
     ^
src/big.c:197:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
      freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
      ^
src/big.c:221:3: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98dupxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
   dup(pvec[0]);
   ^
src/big.c:225:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
      freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
      ^
src/big.c:318:4: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98writexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
    write(fcopy, cp->line, p - cp->line + 1);
    ^
gcc -o pgms/dhry2 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/dhry2reg -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= -DREG=register ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/looper -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/looper.c 
gcc -o pgms/fstime -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/fstime.c 
gcc -o pgms/whetstone-double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH src/whets.c -lm
make all
make[1]: Entering directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make distr
make[2]: Entering directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
Checking distribution of files
./pgms  exists
./src  exists
./testdir  exists
make[2]: Leaving directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make programs
make[2]: Entering directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[2]: Nothing to be done for "programs".
make[2]: Leaving directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[1]: Leaving directory "/tmp/serverscope-2EKCsS/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com


1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation  1
**********************************************
Run: "Process Creation": Fork failed at iteration 1167
Reason: Resource temporarily unavailable; aborting

dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=64K count=64K conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 28.6305 s, 150 MB/s


dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=1M count=4096 conv=fdatasync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 24.4541 s, 176 MB/s

FIO random read

Performance

34.44 MB/s

IOPS

8816

./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=511M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)

benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=13471: Fri Aug 12 18:51:39 2016
  read : io=2066.5MB, bw=35267KB/s, iops=8816, runt= 60002msec
    slat (usec): min=82, max=32592, avg=883.84, stdev=1080.87
    clat (usec): min=6, max=104064, avg=28124.82, stdev=10809.87
     lat (usec): min=762, max=110780, avg=29013.84, stdev=11069.27
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[12864],  5.00th=[15296], 10.00th=[16768], 20.00th=[19072],
     | 30.00th=[21120], 40.00th=[23424], 50.00th=[25728], 60.00th=[28544],
     | 70.00th=[31872], 80.00th=[36096], 90.00th=[42752], 95.00th=[49408],
     | 99.00th=[61696], 99.50th=[67072], 99.90th=[79360], 99.95th=[84480],
     | 99.99th=[92672]
    bw (KB  /s): min= 2416, max= 7912, per=12.52%, avg=4413.81, stdev=957.95
    lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
    lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.08%, 20=24.69%, 50=70.68%
    lat (msec) : 100=4.55%, 250=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=2.46%, sys=5.77%, ctx=536170, majf=0, minf=330
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=529020/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=2066.5MB, aggrb=35266KB/s, minb=35266KB/s, maxb=35266KB/s, mint=60002msec, maxt=60002msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=527636/10, merge=0/8, ticks=265070/20, in_queue=266320, util=99.04%

FIO random direct read

Performance

74.78 MB/s

IOPS

19143

./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=511M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes

benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=13481: Fri Aug 12 18:52:40 2016
  read : io=4487.6MB, bw=76574KB/s, iops=19143, runt= 60010msec
    slat (usec): min=8, max=126859, avg=247.62, stdev=2239.08
    clat (usec): min=3, max=199923, avg=13048.17, stdev=14132.51
     lat (usec): min=230, max=201204, avg=13300.39, stdev=14367.80
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  980],  5.00th=[ 1752], 10.00th=[ 2544], 20.00th=[ 4128],
     | 30.00th=[ 5408], 40.00th=[ 6624], 50.00th=[ 8256], 60.00th=[10560],
     | 70.00th=[13632], 80.00th=[18560], 90.00th=[29056], 95.00th=[41216],
     | 99.00th=[71168], 99.50th=[83456], 99.90th=[114176], 99.95th=[126464],
     | 99.99th=[156672]
    bw (KB  /s): min= 2916, max=24882, per=12.53%, avg=9592.60, stdev=3543.54
    lat (usec) : 4=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.03%
    lat (usec) : 750=0.34%, 1000=0.70%
    lat (msec) : 2=5.49%, 4=12.63%, 10=38.50%, 20=24.36%, 50=14.84%
    lat (msec) : 100=2.91%, 250=0.20%
  cpu          : usr=4.22%, sys=10.40%, ctx=72294, majf=0, minf=340
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=1148804/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=4487.6MB, aggrb=76574KB/s, minb=76574KB/s, maxb=76574KB/s, mint=60010msec, maxt=60010msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=1147151/0, merge=0/0, ticks=4944120/0, in_queue=4956820, util=99.78%

FIO random write

Performance

245.17 MB/s

IOPS

62762

./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=511M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes

benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=13535: Fri Aug 12 18:54:41 2016
  write: io=14712MB, bw=251051KB/s, iops=62762, runt= 60007msec
    slat (usec): min=5, max=1034.1K, avg=106.49, stdev=2729.88
    clat (usec): min=5, max=1049.2K, avg=3953.33, stdev=16604.33
     lat (usec): min=12, max=1049.2K, avg=4063.17, stdev=16847.66
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  370],  5.00th=[  386], 10.00th=[  394], 20.00th=[  406],
     | 30.00th=[  426], 40.00th=[  466], 50.00th=[  510], 60.00th=[  572],
     | 70.00th=[  708], 80.00th=[ 1020], 90.00th=[ 3152], 95.00th=[30592],
     | 99.00th=[58112], 99.50th=[68096], 99.90th=[123392], 99.95th=[207872],
     | 99.99th=[667648]
    bw (KB  /s): min= 1660, max=75248, per=12.70%, avg=31879.59, stdev=10439.78
    lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%
    lat (usec) : 500=47.95%, 750=24.11%, 1000=7.57%
    lat (msec) : 2=8.51%, 4=2.41%, 10=1.16%, 20=1.40%, 50=5.03%
    lat (msec) : 100=1.70%, 250=0.10%, 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%, 2000=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=6.53%, sys=13.02%, ctx=38023, majf=0, minf=99
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=3766202/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=14712MB, aggrb=251050KB/s, minb=251050KB/s, maxb=251050KB/s, mint=60007msec, maxt=60007msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=0/447559, merge=0/579, ticks=0/5761550, in_queue=5770330, util=90.38%

FIO random direct write

Performance

50.23 MB/s

IOPS

12859

./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=511M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 511MB)

benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=13491: Fri Aug 12 18:53:41 2016
  write: io=3053.4MB, bw=51436KB/s, iops=12859, runt= 60780msec
    slat (usec): min=11, max=1128.6K, avg=434.61, stdev=8899.02
    clat (usec): min=25, max=1173.2K, avg=19440.75, stdev=59860.69
     lat (usec): min=140, max=1173.2K, avg=19880.26, stdev=60559.20
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[  988],  5.00th=[ 1768], 10.00th=[ 2640], 20.00th=[ 4896],
     | 30.00th=[ 7136], 40.00th=[ 9664], 50.00th=[12992], 60.00th=[16512],
     | 70.00th=[20096], 80.00th=[24704], 90.00th=[32640], 95.00th=[41216],
     | 99.00th=[69120], 99.50th=[97792], 99.90th=[1019904], 99.95th=[1073152],
     | 99.99th=[1138688]
    bw (KB  /s): min=    3, max=15247, per=13.88%, avg=7136.98, stdev=2662.32
    lat (usec) : 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.04%, 750=0.25%
    lat (usec) : 1000=0.74%
    lat (msec) : 2=5.36%, 4=9.72%, 10=25.26%, 20=28.47%, 50=27.42%
    lat (msec) : 100=2.24%, 250=0.10%, 500=0.03%, 1000=0.20%, 2000=0.15%
  cpu          : usr=2.32%, sys=9.06%, ctx=66238, majf=0, minf=107
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=781577/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=3053.4MB, aggrb=51436KB/s, minb=51436KB/s, maxb=51436KB/s, mint=60780msec, maxt=60780msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=0/781530, merge=0/3758, ticks=0/4882570, in_queue=4996800, util=97.63%

Download benchmark results

Download speed

360.82 Mbit/s

Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 2.297 sec
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 2.356 sec
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 2.154 sec
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 2.206 sec
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 2.073 sec
Finished! Average download speed is 360.82 Mbit/s

Speedtest results

Upload speed

273.11 Mbit/s

Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from Scaleway ...
Selecting 15 servers that are not too close:
  1. iperf.fr (Rouen) [111.21 km]: 3.16 ms
  2. Ikoula (Reims) [131.50 km]: 6.738 ms
  3. LaFibre.info (Douai) [176.53 km]: 3.69 ms
  4. Charlus (Valenciennes) [187.35 km]: 3.611 ms
  5. ATE (Villeneuve-d&#39;Ascq) [204.64 km]: 7.899 ms
  6. Treudler FR (Roubaix) [213.32 km]: 10.117 ms
  7. Verelox (Roubaix) [213.32 km]: 7.37 ms
  8. ePlay TV (Roubaix) [213.32 km]: 8.288 ms
  9. Ultimate AIR Gamers (Roubaix) [213.32 km]: 7.201 ms
  10. myplex.org (Gravelines) [237.06 km]: 8.621 ms
  11. Alabar (Saint-Lo) [251.82 km]: 8.042 ms
  12. CloudConnX (Eastbourne) [258.84 km]: 21.717 ms
  13. Universite Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-La-Neuve) [259.09 km]: 20.663 ms
  14. Orange Belgium (Brussels) [264.26 km]: 17.591 ms
  15. Verixi SPRL (Zaventem) [264.26 km]: 11.765 ms
Testing upload speeds
  1. iperf.fr (Rouen):                            ......................... 360.32 Mbit/s
  2. Ikoula (Reims):                              ......................... 259.27 Mbit/s
  3. LaFibre.info (Douai):                        ......................... 413.67 Mbit/s
  4. Charlus (Valenciennes):                      ......................... 408.51 Mbit/s
  5. ATE (Villeneuve-d&#39;Ascq):                     ......................... 327.41 Mbit/s
  6. Treudler FR (Roubaix):                       ......................... 238.08 Mbit/s
  7. Verelox (Roubaix):                           ......................... 5.43 Mbit/s
  8. ePlay TV (Roubaix):                          ......................... 215.49 Mbit/s
  9. Ultimate AIR Gamers (Roubaix):               ......................... 226.33 Mbit/s
  10. myplex.org (Gravelines):                    ......................... 44.97 Mbit/s
  11. Alabar (Saint-Lo):                          ......................... 326.98 Mbit/s
  12. CloudConnX (Eastbourne):                    ......................... 164.81 Mbit/s
  13. Universite Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-La-Neuve):......................... 167.06 Mbit/s
  14. Orange Belgium (Brussels):                  ......................... 169.37 Mbit/s
  15. Verixi SPRL (Zaventem):                     ......................... 83.68 Mbit/s
Average upload speed is 227.43 Mbit/s