gcc -o pgms/arithoh -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Darithoh src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/register -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum="register int" src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/short -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=short src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/int -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=int src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/long -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=long src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/float -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=float src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=double src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/hanoi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/hanoi.c
gcc -o pgms/syscall -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/syscall.c
gcc -o pgms/context1 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/context1.c
gcc -o pgms/pipe -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/pipe.c
src/pipe.c: In function xe2x80x98mainxe2x80x99:
src/pipe.c:52:2: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98pipexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
pipe(pvec);
^
gcc -o pgms/spawn -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/spawn.c
gcc -o pgms/execl -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/execl.c
In file included from src/execl.c:34:0:
src/big.c: In function xe2x80x98dummyxe2x80x99:
src/big.c:109:5: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen("masterlog.00", "a", stderr);
^
src/big.c:197:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:221:3: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98dupxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
dup(pvec[0]);
^
src/big.c:225:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:318:4: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98writexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
write(fcopy, cp->line, p - cp->line + 1);
^
gcc -o pgms/dhry2 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/dhry2reg -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= -DREG=register ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/looper -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/looper.c
gcc -o pgms/fstime -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/fstime.c
gcc -o pgms/whetstone-double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH src/whets.c -lm
make all
make[1]: Entering directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make distr
make[2]: Entering directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
make[2]: Leaving directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make programs
make[2]: Entering directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[2]: Nothing to be done for "programs".
make[2]: Leaving directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[1]: Leaving directory "/var/www/serverscope-L5FPAK/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: Ubuntu-1604-xenial-64-minimal: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.8.0-53-generic -- #56~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 16 01:18:56 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge) (4200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
14:27:01 up 44 min, 1 user, load average: 8.32, 4.91, 2.10; runlevel 2017-06-19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 19 2017 14:27:01 - 14:55:21
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27402513.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2859.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3377.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 800793.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 236115.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1451570.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1606233.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 209465.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8732.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6240.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 813.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3356216.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27402513.6 2348.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2859.1 519.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 3377.1 785.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 800793.3 2022.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 236115.2 1426.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1451570.4 2502.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1606233.9 1291.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 209465.1 523.7
Process Creation 126.0 8732.2 693.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6240.0 1471.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 813.2 1355.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3356216.3 2237.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1249.5
dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=64K count=32K conv=fdatasync 32768+0 records in 32768+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 4.14671 s, 518 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=1M count=2048 conv=fdatasync 2048+0 records in 2048+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 3.85011 s, 558 MB/s
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=27093: Mon Jun 19 14:23:55 2017
read : io=360584KB, bw=6009.3KB/s, iops=1502, runt= 60005msec
clat (usec): min=81, max=31792, avg=5319.19, stdev=987.17
lat (usec): min=82, max=31792, avg=5319.63, stdev=987.16
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3504], 5.00th=[ 4128], 10.00th=[ 4448], 20.00th=[ 4704],
| 30.00th=[ 4896], 40.00th=[ 5088], 50.00th=[ 5216], 60.00th=[ 5408],
| 70.00th=[ 5536], 80.00th=[ 5792], 90.00th=[ 6176], 95.00th=[ 6688],
| 99.00th=[ 9152], 99.50th=[10304], 99.90th=[12864], 99.95th=[14016],
| 99.99th=[17024]
bw (KB /s): min= 686, max= 944, per=12.51%, avg=751.52, stdev=18.49
lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.06%, 1000=0.09%
lat (msec) : 2=0.17%, 4=3.20%, 10=95.86%, 20=0.61%, 50=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.18%, sys=0.78%, ctx=90547, majf=0, minf=81
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=90146/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=360584KB, aggrb=6009KB/s, minb=6009KB/s, maxb=6009KB/s, mint=60005msec, maxt=60005msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=89984/8, merge=0/6, ticks=474712/20, in_queue=474700, util=99.90%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=27103: Mon Jun 19 14:24:56 2017
read : io=360484KB, bw=6007.6KB/s, iops=1501, runt= 60005msec
clat (usec): min=117, max=32625, avg=5317.55, stdev=968.20
lat (usec): min=117, max=32625, avg=5318.01, stdev=968.19
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3536], 5.00th=[ 4128], 10.00th=[ 4384], 20.00th=[ 4704],
| 30.00th=[ 4896], 40.00th=[ 5088], 50.00th=[ 5216], 60.00th=[ 5408],
| 70.00th=[ 5600], 80.00th=[ 5792], 90.00th=[ 6176], 95.00th=[ 6688],
| 99.00th=[ 9024], 99.50th=[ 9920], 99.90th=[12480], 99.95th=[13632],
| 99.99th=[16192]
bw (KB /s): min= 686, max= 904, per=12.51%, avg=751.20, stdev=15.77
lat (usec) : 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.06%, 1000=0.08%
lat (msec) : 2=0.16%, 4=3.21%, 10=95.99%, 20=0.49%, 50=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.20%, sys=0.63%, ctx=90460, majf=0, minf=80
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=90121/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=360484KB, aggrb=6007KB/s, minb=6007KB/s, maxb=6007KB/s, mint=60005msec, maxt=60005msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=89992/0, merge=0/0, ticks=475564/0, in_queue=475536, util=99.84%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=27123: Mon Jun 19 14:26:56 2017
write: io=6550.4MB, bw=111771KB/s, iops=27942, runt= 60009msec
clat (usec): min=1, max=561888, avg=267.03, stdev=6019.58
lat (usec): min=2, max=561889, avg=267.67, stdev=6023.92
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 2], 5.00th=[ 2], 10.00th=[ 3], 20.00th=[ 3],
| 30.00th=[ 3], 40.00th=[ 3], 50.00th=[ 3], 60.00th=[ 3],
| 70.00th=[ 4], 80.00th=[ 6], 90.00th=[ 8], 95.00th=[ 11],
| 99.00th=[ 31], 99.50th=[ 1160], 99.90th=[89600], 99.95th=[138240],
| 99.99th=[236544]
bw (KB /s): min= 0, max=55195, per=13.47%, avg=15060.38, stdev=8761.90
lat (usec) : 2=0.01%, 4=60.27%, 10=32.57%, 20=5.51%, 50=0.98%
lat (usec) : 100=0.13%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.02%, 4=0.05%, 10=0.09%, 20=0.07%, 50=0.10%
lat (msec) : 100=0.09%, 250=0.08%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.54%, sys=1.80%, ctx=27806, majf=0, minf=83
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=1676810/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=6550.4MB, aggrb=111770KB/s, minb=111770KB/s, maxb=111770KB/s, mint=60009msec, maxt=60009msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=0/90104, merge=0/3825, ticks=0/5814076, in_queue=5820884, util=98.90%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=27113: Mon Jun 19 14:25:56 2017
write: io=354744KB, bw=5906.8KB/s, iops=1476, runt= 60058msec
clat (usec): min=83, max=299467, avg=5411.30, stdev=24246.79
lat (usec): min=84, max=299467, avg=5411.89, stdev=24246.90
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 115], 5.00th=[ 129], 10.00th=[ 139], 20.00th=[ 157],
| 30.00th=[ 195], 40.00th=[ 772], 50.00th=[ 844], 60.00th=[ 884],
| 70.00th=[ 972], 80.00th=[ 1032], 90.00th=[ 1064], 95.00th=[ 1160],
| 99.00th=[127488], 99.50th=[132096], 99.90th=[168960], 99.95th=[268288],
| 99.99th=[288768]
bw (KB /s): min= 94, max= 1344, per=12.51%, avg=738.88, stdev=231.27
lat (usec) : 100=0.20%, 250=34.06%, 500=2.43%, 750=2.05%, 1000=34.64%
lat (msec) : 2=22.63%, 4=0.06%, 10=0.03%, 20=0.02%, 50=0.01%
lat (msec) : 100=0.13%, 250=3.67%, 500=0.08%
cpu : usr=0.18%, sys=0.73%, ctx=181003, majf=0, minf=82
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=88686/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=354744KB, aggrb=5906KB/s, minb=5906KB/s, maxb=5906KB/s, mint=60058msec, maxt=60058msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=0/88747, merge=0/2042, ticks=0/58904, in_queue=58944, util=91.51%
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.950 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.923 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.960 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.887 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.991 sec Finished! Average download speed is 849.08 Mbit/s
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from Hetzner ... Selecting 15 servers that are not too close: 1. Onlime GmbH (Aerzen) [83.89 km]: 32.086 ms 2. IT Ohlendorf (Salzgitter) [111.93 km]: 9.721 ms 3. Hanne & Fomenko GbR (Salzgitter) [111.93 km]: 10.579 ms 4. Newone (Ilmenau) [120.64 km]: 13.407 ms 5. Thueringer Netkom GmbH (Weimar) [132.12 km]: 17.945 ms 6. Vodafone DE (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 9.398 ms 7. SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 8.222 ms 8. 23media GmbH (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 9.065 ms 9. DEAC (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 13.123 ms 10. IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 9.53 ms 11. LWLcom GmbH (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 8.942 ms 12. Interoute VDC (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 13.783 ms 13. Jublo Solutions (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 136.586 ms 14. LeaseWeb (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 21.734 ms 15. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg) [154.74 km]: 7.311 ms Testing upload speeds 1. Onlime GmbH (Aerzen): ......................... 57.74 Mbit/s 2. IT Ohlendorf (Salzgitter): ......................... 324.28 Mbit/s 3. Hanne & Fomenko GbR (Salzgitter): ......................... 144.75 Mbit/s 4. Newone (Ilmenau): ......................... 217.53 Mbit/s 5. Thueringer Netkom GmbH (Weimar): ......................... 335.95 Mbit/s 6. Vodafone DE (Frankfurt): ......................... 533.83 Mbit/s 7. SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. (Frankfurt): ......................... 664.15 Mbit/s 8. 23media GmbH (Frankfurt): ......................... 566.06 Mbit/s 9. DEAC (Frankfurt): ......................... 602.33 Mbit/s 10. IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG (Frankfurt): ......................... 792.54 Mbit/s 11. LWLcom GmbH (Frankfurt): ......................... 418.54 Mbit/s 12. Interoute VDC (Frankfurt): ......................... 345.75 Mbit/s 13. Jublo Solutions (Frankfurt): ......................... 236.55 Mbit/s 14. LeaseWeb (Frankfurt): ......................... 385.97 Mbit/s 15. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg): ......................... 341.64 Mbit/s Average upload speed is 397.84 Mbit/s