gcc -o pgms/arithoh -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Darithoh src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/register -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum="register int" src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/short -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=short src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/int -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=int src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/long -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=long src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/float -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=float src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=double src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/hanoi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/hanoi.c
gcc -o pgms/syscall -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/syscall.c
gcc -o pgms/context1 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/context1.c
gcc -o pgms/pipe -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/pipe.c
src/pipe.c: In function xe2x80x98mainxe2x80x99:
src/pipe.c:52:2: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98pipexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
pipe(pvec);
^
gcc -o pgms/spawn -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/spawn.c
gcc -o pgms/execl -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/execl.c
In file included from src/execl.c:34:0:
src/big.c: In function xe2x80x98dummyxe2x80x99:
src/big.c:109:5: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen("masterlog.00", "a", stderr);
^
src/big.c:197:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:221:3: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98dupxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
dup(pvec[0]);
^
src/big.c:225:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:318:4: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98writexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
write(fcopy, cp->line, p - cp->line + 1);
^
gcc -o pgms/dhry2 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/dhry2reg -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= -DREG=register ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/looper -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/looper.c
gcc -o pgms/fstime -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/fstime.c
gcc -o pgms/whetstone-double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH src/whets.c -lm
make all
make[1]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make distr
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make programs
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[2]: Nothing to be done for "programs".
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[1]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: test: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.4.0-45-generic -- #66-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 19 14:12:37 UTC 2016
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz (3600.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz (3600.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz (3600.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz (3600.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
16:45:09 up 4:42, 1 user, load average: 7.62, 4.48, 1.90; runlevel 2016-11-05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: So nov 05 2016 16:45:09 - 17:13:36
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24535148.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2637.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2327.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 828535.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 229477.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1780964.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1626492.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 172709.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5573.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7601.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2400.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2588113.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24535148.4 2102.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2637.2 479.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 2327.9 541.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 828535.8 2092.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 229477.5 1386.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1780964.3 3070.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1626492.6 1307.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 172709.1 431.8
Process Creation 126.0 5573.0 442.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7601.9 1792.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2400.2 4000.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2588113.9 1725.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1253.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: So nov 05 2016 17:13:36 - 17:41:55
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 98261357.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10517.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11258.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 841795.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 221676.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2342748.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6543555.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 590563.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 27596.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 22609.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2989.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4920190.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 98261357.1 8420.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10517.5 1912.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 11258.0 2618.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 841795.9 2125.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 221676.6 1339.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2342748.5 4039.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6543555.7 5260.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 590563.9 1476.4
Process Creation 126.0 27596.1 2190.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 22609.3 5332.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2989.3 4982.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4920190.3 3280.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3076.4
dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=64K count=64K conv=fdatasync 65536+0 records in 65536+0 records out 4294967296 bytes (4,3 GB, 4,0 GiB) copied, 26,9916 s, 159 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=1M count=4096 conv=fdatasync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 4294967296 bytes (4,3 GB, 4,0 GiB) copied, 6,38059 s, 673 MB/s
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=2047M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=21756: Sat Nov 5 16:42:04 2016
read : io=10488MB, bw=178984KB/s, iops=44746, runt= 60001msec
slat (usec): min=33, max=1681.6K, avg=172.11, stdev=3938.12
clat (usec): min=4, max=1688.2K, avg=5543.55, stdev=22144.24
lat (usec): min=100, max=1688.4K, avg=5717.32, stdev=22502.36
clat percentiles (msec):
| 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 3], 10.00th=[ 4], 20.00th=[ 4],
| 30.00th=[ 4], 40.00th=[ 5], 50.00th=[ 5], 60.00th=[ 5],
| 70.00th=[ 6], 80.00th=[ 6], 90.00th=[ 7], 95.00th=[ 8],
| 99.00th=[ 11], 99.50th=[ 15], 99.90th=[ 343], 99.95th=[ 478],
| 99.99th=[ 758]
bw (KB /s): min= 331, max=42760, per=13.03%, avg=23321.65, stdev=9197.33
lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=39.11%, 10=59.68%, 20=0.96%, 50=0.05%
lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.04%, 500=0.11%, 750=0.04%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2000=0.01%
cpu : usr=3.93%, sys=13.12%, ctx=2783320, majf=0, minf=350
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=2684806/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=10488MB, aggrb=178984KB/s, minb=178984KB/s, maxb=178984KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=2677545/10, merge=0/16, ticks=354460/0, in_queue=355840, util=100.00%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=2047M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=21766: Sat Nov 5 16:43:04 2016
read : io=36736MB, bw=626938KB/s, iops=156734, runt= 60002msec
slat (usec): min=2, max=49227, avg=34.45, stdev=202.59
clat (usec): min=45, max=90016, avg=1584.36, stdev=1064.72
lat (usec): min=52, max=90022, avg=1619.30, stdev=1081.31
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 195], 5.00th=[ 274], 10.00th=[ 652], 20.00th=[ 788],
| 30.00th=[ 892], 40.00th=[ 1048], 50.00th=[ 1512], 60.00th=[ 1672],
| 70.00th=[ 1816], 80.00th=[ 2288], 90.00th=[ 2800], 95.00th=[ 3440],
| 99.00th=[ 4960], 99.50th=[ 5728], 99.90th=[ 8256], 99.95th=[ 9792],
| 99.99th=[15808]
bw (KB /s): min= 7, max=162392, per=12.51%, avg=78431.10, stdev=13049.77
lat (usec) : 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=4.18%, 500=1.99%, 750=10.60%
lat (usec) : 1000=21.22%
lat (msec) : 2=38.07%, 4=21.33%, 10=2.56%, 20=0.04%, 50=0.01%
lat (msec) : 100=0.01%
cpu : usr=4.34%, sys=15.93%, ctx=558810, majf=0, minf=339
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=9404382/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=36736MB, aggrb=626937KB/s, minb=626937KB/s, maxb=626937KB/s, mint=60002msec, maxt=60002msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=9394223/0, merge=0/0, ticks=6048016/0, in_queue=6097120, util=99.90%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=2047M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=21898: Sat Nov 5 16:45:05 2016
write: io=24505MB, bw=418163KB/s, iops=104540, runt= 60009msec
slat (usec): min=1, max=1005.7K, avg=72.27, stdev=2042.88
clat (usec): min=2, max=1020.7K, avg=2354.18, stdev=12006.95
lat (usec): min=6, max=1020.7K, avg=2427.15, stdev=12203.17
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 157], 5.00th=[ 181], 10.00th=[ 203], 20.00th=[ 237],
| 30.00th=[ 270], 40.00th=[ 306], 50.00th=[ 346], 60.00th=[ 386],
| 70.00th=[ 442], 80.00th=[ 556], 90.00th=[ 1336], 95.00th=[11200],
| 99.00th=[47360], 99.50th=[69120], 99.90th=[134144], 99.95th=[158720],
| 99.99th=[244736]
bw (KB /s): min= 1, max=161536, per=12.75%, avg=53303.61, stdev=26826.51
lat (usec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%
lat (usec) : 250=24.42%, 500=51.85%, 750=9.86%, 1000=2.45%
lat (msec) : 2=2.79%, 4=1.57%, 10=1.71%, 20=2.08%, 50=2.40%
lat (msec) : 100=0.65%, 250=0.22%, 500=0.01%, 1000=0.01%, 2000=0.01%
cpu : usr=2.49%, sys=18.10%, ctx=147280, majf=0, minf=92
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=6273388/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=24505MB, aggrb=418163KB/s, minb=418163KB/s, maxb=418163KB/s, mint=60009msec, maxt=60009msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=68/306236, merge=0/17054, ticks=444/3615384, in_queue=3616508, util=95.81%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=2047M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 2047MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=21776: Sat Nov 5 16:44:05 2016
write: io=4839.3MB, bw=82577KB/s, iops=20644, runt= 60010msec
slat (usec): min=3, max=46228, avg=333.72, stdev=1402.88
clat (usec): min=176, max=92066, avg=12061.02, stdev=6818.57
lat (usec): min=221, max=92073, avg=12395.36, stdev=6983.26
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 1992], 5.00th=[ 3696], 10.00th=[ 4832], 20.00th=[ 6432],
| 30.00th=[ 7840], 40.00th=[ 9280], 50.00th=[10688], 60.00th=[12352],
| 70.00th=[14272], 80.00th=[17024], 90.00th=[21120], 95.00th=[24960],
| 99.00th=[34048], 99.50th=[37632], 99.90th=[48384], 99.95th=[53504],
| 99.99th=[69120]
bw (KB /s): min= 5288, max=15296, per=12.52%, avg=10334.64, stdev=1450.79
lat (usec) : 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.04%, 1000=0.11%
lat (msec) : 2=0.85%, 4=5.11%, 10=39.21%, 20=42.82%, 50=11.78%
lat (msec) : 100=0.08%
cpu : usr=0.89%, sys=5.03%, ctx=286999, majf=0, minf=88
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=1238858/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=4839.3MB, aggrb=82576KB/s, minb=82576KB/s, maxb=82576KB/s, mint=60010msec, maxt=60010msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=0/1238652, merge=0/18203, ticks=0/7170252, in_queue=7197528, util=100.00%
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0,834 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0,789 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 1,360 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0,822 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0,818 sec Finished! Average download speed is 865.24 Mbit/s
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from DigitalOcean ... Selecting 15 servers that are not too close: 1. Neon IT Kevin Wendel (Riedstadt) [34.11 km]: 20.116 ms 2. PfalzKom (Ludwigshafen) [72.88 km]: 10.15 ms 3. TWL-KOM (Ludwigshafen) [72.88 km]: 10.61 ms 4. KEVAG Telekom GmbH (Koblenz) [81.79 km]: 12.566 ms 5. HillCom Solutions (Alsfeld) [81.91 km]: 28.263 ms 6. www.Wint.global (Waghaeusel) [97.12 km]: 21.65 ms 7. Mobile Breitbandnetze GmbH (Freisbach) [98.51 km]: 26.068 ms 8. iWelt AG (Eibelstadt) [103.95 km]: 20.004 ms 9. hotspot.koeln (Cologne) [152.54 km]: 8.495 ms 10. NetCologne (Cologne) [152.54 km]: 9.061 ms 11. KUES DATA GmbH (Losheim am See) [154.52 km]: 12.403 ms 12. intersaar GmbH (Saarbrucken) [156.65 km]: 1800000.0 ms 13. TBits.net GmbH (Alfdorf) [159.96 km]: 18.614 ms 14. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg) [163.40 km]: 10.391 ms 15. inexio (Saarlouis) [165.02 km]: 28.413 ms Testing upload speeds 1. Neon IT Kevin Wendel (Riedstadt): ......................... 65.58 Mbit/s 2. PfalzKom (Ludwigshafen): ......................... 116.24 Mbit/s 3. TWL-KOM (Ludwigshafen): ......................... 108.68 Mbit/s 4. KEVAG Telekom GmbH (Koblenz): ......................... 444.71 Mbit/s 5. HillCom Solutions (Alsfeld): ......................... 53.18 Mbit/s 6. www.Wint.global (Waghaeusel): ......................... 379.77 Mbit/s 7. Mobile Breitbandnetze GmbH (Freisbach): ......................... 10.27 Mbit/s 8. iWelt AG (Eibelstadt): ......................... 329.25 Mbit/s 9. hotspot.koeln (Cologne): ......................... 46.13 Mbit/s 10. NetCologne (Cologne): ......................... 107.82 Mbit/s 11. KUES DATA GmbH (Losheim am See): ......................... 94.12 Mbit/s 12. intersaar GmbH (Saarbrucken): ......................... 0.00 Mbit/s 13. TBits.net GmbH (Alfdorf): ......................... 33.30 Mbit/s 14. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg): ......................... 103.67 Mbit/s 15. inexio (Saarlouis): ......................... 116.81 Mbit/s Average upload speed is 133.97 Mbit/s