gcc -o pgms/arithoh -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Darithoh src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/register -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum="register int" src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/short -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=short src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/int -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=int src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/long -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=long src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/float -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=float src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=double src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/hanoi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/hanoi.c
gcc -o pgms/syscall -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/syscall.c
gcc -o pgms/context1 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/context1.c
gcc -o pgms/pipe -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/pipe.c
src/pipe.c: In function ‘main’:
src/pipe.c:52:2: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pipe’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
pipe(pvec);
^
gcc -o pgms/spawn -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/spawn.c
gcc -o pgms/execl -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/execl.c
In file included from src/execl.c:34:0:
src/big.c: In function ‘dummy’:
src/big.c:109:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘freopen’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen("masterlog.00", "a", stderr);
^
src/big.c:197:6: warning: ignoring return value of ‘freopen’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:221:3: warning: ignoring return value of ‘dup’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
dup(pvec[0]);
^
src/big.c:225:6: warning: ignoring return value of ‘freopen’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:318:4: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
write(fcopy, cp->line, p - cp->line + 1);
^
gcc -o pgms/dhry2 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/dhry2reg -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= -DREG=register ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/looper -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/looper.c
gcc -o pgms/fstime -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/fstime.c
gcc -o pgms/whetstone-double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH src/whets.c -lm
make all
make[1]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make distr
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make programs
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[2]: Nothing to be done for "programs".
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[1]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: test: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.4.0-45-generic -- #66-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 19 14:12:37 UTC 2016
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz (3595.8 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
15:05:37 up 44 min, 1 user, load average: 7.54, 4.34, 1.84; runlevel 2016-10-24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 24 2016 15:05:37 - 15:33:27
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17479114.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2017.6 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2318.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 743581.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 182930.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1180420.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1342044.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 164772.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6008.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4292.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 587.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2242338.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17479114.0 1497.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2017.6 366.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2318.5 539.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 743581.2 1877.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 182930.7 1105.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1180420.7 2035.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1342044.7 1078.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 164772.8 411.9
Process Creation 126.0 6008.6 476.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4292.4 1012.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 587.6 979.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2242338.0 1494.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 925.1
dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=64K count=32K conv=fdatasync 32768+0 records in 32768+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 6.89109 s, 312 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=1M count=2048 conv=fdatasync 2048+0 records in 2048+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 5.79663 s, 370 MB/s
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=128M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=11403: Mon Oct 24 15:02:32 2016
read : io=6860.8MB, bw=117088KB/s, iops=29271, runt= 60001msec
slat (usec): min=1, max=130334, avg=264.91, stdev=756.14
clat (usec): min=3, max=147144, avg=8472.15, stdev=6263.98
lat (usec): min=185, max=147159, avg=8738.86, stdev=6386.16
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 2416], 5.00th=[ 3248], 10.00th=[ 3760], 20.00th=[ 4512],
| 30.00th=[ 5152], 40.00th=[ 5856], 50.00th=[ 6688], 60.00th=[ 7712],
| 70.00th=[ 9024], 80.00th=[10944], 90.00th=[14656], 95.00th=[19840],
| 99.00th=[34560], 99.50th=[42240], 99.90th=[58112], 99.95th=[67072],
| 99.99th=[84480]
bw (KB /s): min= 5752, max=30200, per=12.48%, avg=14617.47, stdev=4133.06
lat (usec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%
lat (usec) : 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.30%, 4=12.42%, 10=62.60%, 20=19.73%, 50=4.72%
lat (msec) : 100=0.21%, 250=0.01%
cpu : usr=2.42%, sys=6.65%, ctx=1194606, majf=2, minf=352
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=1756344/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=6860.8MB, aggrb=117087KB/s, minb=117087KB/s, maxb=117087KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=1183504/7, merge=0/2, ticks=118596/4, in_queue=118132, util=91.46%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=128M --runtime=60 --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=11413: Mon Oct 24 15:03:32 2016
read : io=15180MB, bw=259019KB/s, iops=64754, runt= 60012msec
slat (usec): min=2, max=72262, avg=63.43, stdev=928.86
clat (usec): min=18, max=81917, avg=3868.65, stdev=5949.04
lat (usec): min=99, max=81922, avg=3933.55, stdev=6017.64
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 187], 5.00th=[ 247], 10.00th=[ 294], 20.00th=[ 398],
| 30.00th=[ 644], 40.00th=[ 1368], 50.00th=[ 1992], 60.00th=[ 2640],
| 70.00th=[ 3504], 80.00th=[ 5088], 90.00th=[ 9152], 95.00th=[15808],
| 99.00th=[31360], 99.50th=[34560], 99.90th=[43264], 99.95th=[47360],
| 99.99th=[58112]
bw (KB /s): min=12780, max=45762, per=12.53%, avg=32442.81, stdev=5241.04
lat (usec) : 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=5.33%, 500=21.04%
lat (usec) : 750=5.19%, 1000=3.26%
lat (msec) : 2=15.39%, 4=23.74%, 10=17.09%, 20=5.39%, 50=3.53%
lat (msec) : 100=0.04%
cpu : usr=2.93%, sys=7.61%, ctx=137614, majf=0, minf=337
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=3886069/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=15180MB, aggrb=259019KB/s, minb=259019KB/s, maxb=259019KB/s, mint=60012msec, maxt=60012msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=3873191/0, merge=0/0, ticks=2694612/0, in_queue=2693784, util=97.09%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=128M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=11451: Mon Oct 24 15:05:34 2016
write: io=24253MB, bw=413863KB/s, iops=103465, runt= 60008msec
slat (usec): min=1, max=152594, avg=60.99, stdev=1023.89
clat (usec): min=2, max=164300, avg=2398.03, stdev=7441.53
lat (usec): min=5, max=164305, avg=2461.47, stdev=7529.96
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 125], 5.00th=[ 129], 10.00th=[ 135], 20.00th=[ 143],
| 30.00th=[ 149], 40.00th=[ 161], 50.00th=[ 189], 60.00th=[ 203],
| 70.00th=[ 225], 80.00th=[ 290], 90.00th=[ 2768], 95.00th=[21120],
| 99.00th=[35072], 99.50th=[39680], 99.90th=[49920], 99.95th=[57600],
| 99.99th=[134144]
bw (KB /s): min= 4405, max=79753, per=12.52%, avg=51798.08, stdev=9178.44
lat (usec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%
lat (usec) : 250=77.23%, 500=7.54%, 750=1.84%, 1000=1.01%
lat (msec) : 2=1.86%, 4=0.85%, 10=1.11%, 20=2.96%, 50=5.48%
lat (msec) : 100=0.08%, 250=0.02%
cpu : usr=2.80%, sys=7.90%, ctx=62884, majf=0, minf=99
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=6208778/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=24253MB, aggrb=413863KB/s, minb=413863KB/s, maxb=413863KB/s, mint=60008msec, maxt=60008msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=0/327062, merge=0/142, ticks=0/6601040, in_queue=6600880, util=92.70%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=128M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --ioengine=libaio --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 128MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=11423: Mon Oct 24 15:04:33 2016
write: io=2678.9MB, bw=45710KB/s, iops=11427, runt= 60011msec
slat (usec): min=2, max=70529, avg=542.66, stdev=2663.69
clat (usec): min=161, max=207824, avg=21845.47, stdev=14173.31
lat (usec): min=247, max=229359, avg=22389.34, stdev=14498.78
clat percentiles (msec):
| 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 8], 10.00th=[ 11], 20.00th=[ 13],
| 30.00th=[ 15], 40.00th=[ 17], 50.00th=[ 19], 60.00th=[ 22],
| 70.00th=[ 24], 80.00th=[ 29], 90.00th=[ 37], 95.00th=[ 48],
| 99.00th=[ 80], 99.50th=[ 93], 99.90th=[ 126], 99.95th=[ 137],
| 99.99th=[ 165]
bw (KB /s): min= 3033, max= 8755, per=12.51%, avg=5720.26, stdev=993.64
lat (usec) : 250=0.01%, 500=0.03%, 750=0.04%, 1000=0.05%
lat (msec) : 2=0.27%, 4=0.99%, 10=8.57%, 20=45.91%, 50=39.80%
lat (msec) : 100=3.98%, 250=0.35%
cpu : usr=1.00%, sys=2.65%, ctx=107854, majf=0, minf=89
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=685779/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=2678.9MB, aggrb=45710KB/s, minb=45710KB/s, maxb=45710KB/s, mint=60011msec, maxt=60011msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=1/684994, merge=0/476, ticks=0/7123752, in_queue=7125512, util=99.86%
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 1.330 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.934 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.786 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.842 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.930 sec Finished! Average download speed is 829.53 Mbit/s
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from DigitalOcean ... Selecting 15 servers that are not too close: 1. Neon IT Kevin Wendel (Riedstadt) [34.11 km]: 196.764 ms 2. PfalzKom (Ludwigshafen) [72.88 km]: 14.867 ms 3. KEVAG Telekom GmbH (Koblenz) [81.79 km]: 17.482 ms 4. HillCom Solutions (Alsfeld) [81.91 km]: 11.117 ms 5. www.Wint.global (Waghaeusel) [97.12 km]: 932.085 ms 6. Mobile Breitbandnetze GmbH (Freisbach) [98.51 km]: 177.727 ms 7. iWelt AG (Eibelstadt) [103.95 km]: 86.36 ms 8. Kroell Systems GbR. (Eitorf) [113.61 km]: 256.58 ms 9. hotspot.koeln (Cologne) [152.54 km]: 36.796 ms 10. NetCologne (Cologne) [152.54 km]: 52.62 ms 11. KUES DATA GmbH (Losheim am See) [154.52 km]: 31.354 ms 12. intersaar GmbH (Saarbrucken) [156.65 km]: 22.666 ms 13. TBits.net GmbH (Alfdorf) [159.96 km]: 115.84 ms 14. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg) [163.40 km]: 33.585 ms 15. inexio (Saarlouis) [165.02 km]: 25.178 ms Testing upload speeds 1. Neon IT Kevin Wendel (Riedstadt): ......................... 7.52 Mbit/s 2. PfalzKom (Ludwigshafen): ......................... 8.26 Mbit/s 3. KEVAG Telekom GmbH (Koblenz): ......................... 79.46 Mbit/s 4. HillCom Solutions (Alsfeld): ......................... 14.61 Mbit/s 5. www.Wint.global (Waghaeusel): ......................... 52.88 Mbit/s 6. Mobile Breitbandnetze GmbH (Freisbach): ......................... 22.21 Mbit/s 7. iWelt AG (Eibelstadt): ......................... 6.47 Mbit/s 8. Kroell Systems GbR. (Eitorf): ......................... 7.66 Mbit/s 9. hotspot.koeln (Cologne): ......................... 20.97 Mbit/s 10. NetCologne (Cologne): ......................... 47.30 Mbit/s 11. KUES DATA GmbH (Losheim am See): ......................... 11.23 Mbit/s 12. intersaar GmbH (Saarbrucken): ......................... 4.12 Mbit/s 13. TBits.net GmbH (Alfdorf): ......................... 11.36 Mbit/s 14. suec//dacor GmbH (Coburg): ......................... 97.29 Mbit/s 15. inexio (Saarlouis): ......................... 4.86 Mbit/s Average upload speed is 26.41 Mbit/s