gcc -o pgms/arithoh -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Darithoh src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/register -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum="register int" src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/short -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=short src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/int -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=int src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/long -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=long src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/float -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=float src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -Ddatum=double src/arith.c
gcc -o pgms/hanoi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/hanoi.c
gcc -o pgms/syscall -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/syscall.c
gcc -o pgms/context1 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/context1.c
gcc -o pgms/pipe -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/pipe.c
src/pipe.c: In function xe2x80x98mainxe2x80x99:
src/pipe.c:52:2: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98pipexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
pipe(pvec);
^
gcc -o pgms/spawn -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/spawn.c
gcc -o pgms/execl -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/execl.c
In file included from src/execl.c:34:0:
src/big.c: In function xe2x80x98dummyxe2x80x99:
src/big.c:109:5: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen("masterlog.00", "a", stderr);
^
src/big.c:197:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:221:3: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98dupxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
dup(pvec[0]);
^
src/big.c:225:6: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98freopenxe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
freopen(logname, "w", stderr);
^
src/big.c:318:4: warning: ignoring return value of xe2x80x98writexe2x80x99, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
write(fcopy, cp->line, p - cp->line + 1);
^
gcc -o pgms/dhry2 -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/dhry2reg -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DHZ= -DREG=register ./src/dhry_1.c ./src/dhry_2.c
gcc -o pgms/looper -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/looper.c
gcc -o pgms/fstime -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME src/fstime.c
gcc -o pgms/whetstone-double -Wall -pedantic -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -mtune=native -I ./src -DTIME -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH src/whets.c -lm
make all
make[1]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make distr
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make programs
make[2]: Entering directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[2]: Nothing to be done for "programs".
make[2]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
make[1]: Leaving directory "/root/serverscope-oT0B4f/byte-unixbench/UnixBench"
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ubuntu-2gb-fsn1-1: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.4.0-97-generic -- #120-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 19 17:28:18 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge) (4200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
21:50:52 up 11 min, 2 users, load average: 7.58, 4.68, 2.04; runlevel 2017-10-26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 26 2017 21:50:52 - 22:19:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26985899.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3383.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5031.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1027898.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 272587.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2471528.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1784780.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 271434.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14732.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8422.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1092.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3266035.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26985899.4 2312.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3383.8 615.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5031.9 1170.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1027898.9 2595.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 272587.8 1647.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2471528.7 4261.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1784780.7 1434.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 271434.6 678.6
Process Creation 126.0 14732.3 1169.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8422.2 1986.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1092.4 1820.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3266035.0 2177.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1595.4
dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=64K count=32K conv=fdatasync 32768+0 records in 32768+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 5.67453 s, 378 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=benchmark bs=1M count=2048 conv=fdatasync 2048+0 records in 2048+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB, 2.0 GiB) copied, 4.80145 s, 447 MB/s
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=15863: Thu Oct 26 21:47:48 2017
read : io=20003MB, bw=341382KB/s, iops=85345, runt= 60001msec
clat (usec): min=0, max=8940, avg=91.00, stdev=157.55
lat (usec): min=1, max=8940, avg=91.36, stdev=157.62
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 1], 5.00th=[ 1], 10.00th=[ 1], 20.00th=[ 1],
| 30.00th=[ 2], 40.00th=[ 2], 50.00th=[ 43], 60.00th=[ 61],
| 70.00th=[ 91], 80.00th=[ 203], 90.00th=[ 253], 95.00th=[ 302],
| 99.00th=[ 540], 99.50th=[ 780], 99.90th=[ 2128], 99.95th=[ 2352],
| 99.99th=[ 3824]
bw (KB /s): min=12912, max=84790, per=12.49%, avg=42647.09, stdev=13063.59
lat (usec) : 2=20.03%, 4=21.86%, 10=3.24%, 20=1.14%, 50=7.45%
lat (usec) : 100=17.70%, 250=18.17%, 500=9.21%, 750=0.66%, 1000=0.23%
lat (msec) : 2=0.19%, 4=0.11%, 10=0.01%
cpu : usr=1.92%, sys=7.70%, ctx=2974078, majf=2, minf=102
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=5120819/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=20003MB, aggrb=341382KB/s, minb=341382KB/s, maxb=341382KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=2692501/8, merge=0/6, ticks=353656/0, in_queue=353316, util=97.80%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randread --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=15873: Thu Oct 26 21:48:48 2017
read : io=12756MB, bw=217698KB/s, iops=54424, runt= 60001msec
clat (usec): min=21, max=12247, avg=143.94, stdev=155.80
lat (usec): min=22, max=12248, avg=144.23, stdev=155.81
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 31], 5.00th=[ 37], 10.00th=[ 41], 20.00th=[ 48],
| 30.00th=[ 55], 40.00th=[ 65], 50.00th=[ 79], 60.00th=[ 135],
| 70.00th=[ 205], 80.00th=[ 229], 90.00th=[ 266], 95.00th=[ 326],
| 99.00th=[ 708], 99.50th=[ 956], 99.90th=[ 1624], 99.95th=[ 2008],
| 99.99th=[ 3824]
bw (KB /s): min=11264, max=34088, per=12.51%, avg=27244.01, stdev=3024.19
lat (usec) : 50=22.20%, 100=34.24%, 250=29.91%, 500=11.72%, 750=1.05%
lat (usec) : 1000=0.42%
lat (msec) : 2=0.40%, 4=0.04%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%
cpu : usr=1.66%, sys=5.82%, ctx=3368758, majf=0, minf=80
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=3265519/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=12756MB, aggrb=217697KB/s, minb=217697KB/s, maxb=217697KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=3261740/2, merge=0/1, ticks=401428/4, in_queue=401048, util=99.41%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=15894: Thu Oct 26 21:50:48 2017
write: io=59179MB, bw=986.13MB/s, iops=252448, runt= 60012msec
clat (usec): min=0, max=68886, avg=26.78, stdev=655.69
lat (usec): min=0, max=68886, avg=27.65, stdev=676.10
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 1], 5.00th=[ 1], 10.00th=[ 1], 20.00th=[ 2],
| 30.00th=[ 2], 40.00th=[ 2], 50.00th=[ 2], 60.00th=[ 2],
| 70.00th=[ 2], 80.00th=[ 2], 90.00th=[ 2], 95.00th=[ 3],
| 99.00th=[ 17], 99.50th=[ 19], 99.90th=[11968], 99.95th=[18048],
| 99.99th=[25216]
bw (KB /s): min=76377, max=162808, per=12.50%, avg=126253.70, stdev=12840.54
lat (usec) : 2=19.14%, 4=77.62%, 10=0.63%, 20=2.16%, 50=0.24%
lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.05%, 20=0.08%, 50=0.04%
lat (msec) : 100=0.01%
cpu : usr=2.24%, sys=8.67%, ctx=57046, majf=0, minf=82
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=15149926/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=59179MB, aggrb=986.13MB/s, minb=986.13MB/s, maxb=986.13MB/s, mint=60012msec, maxt=60012msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=739/965973, merge=94/54, ticks=336/1186996, in_queue=1186676, util=35.93%
./fio --time_based --name=benchmark --size=256M --runtime=60 --filename=benchmark --randrepeat=1 --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --verify=0 --verify_fatal=0 --numjobs=8 --rw=randwrite --blocksize=4k --group_reporting
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.8
Starting 8 processes
benchmark: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB)
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=15883: Thu Oct 26 21:49:48 2017
write: io=2718.5MB, bw=46392KB/s, iops=11597, runt= 60005msec
clat (usec): min=29, max=502878, avg=686.68, stdev=6208.59
lat (usec): min=29, max=502878, avg=687.37, stdev=6208.60
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 43], 5.00th=[ 49], 10.00th=[ 53], 20.00th=[ 57],
| 30.00th=[ 62], 40.00th=[ 68], 50.00th=[ 74], 60.00th=[ 80],
| 70.00th=[ 89], 80.00th=[ 99], 90.00th=[ 117], 95.00th=[ 135],
| 99.00th=[41216], 99.50th=[48896], 99.90th=[59648], 99.95th=[63744],
| 99.99th=[72192]
bw (KB /s): min= 1004, max= 8808, per=12.62%, avg=5856.27, stdev=1119.37
lat (usec) : 50=5.28%, 100=74.96%, 250=18.35%, 500=0.10%, 750=0.03%
lat (usec) : 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.03%, 4=0.02%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.77%
lat (msec) : 100=0.44%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.59%, sys=1.74%, ctx=1400743, majf=0, minf=82
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=695932/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=2718.5MB, aggrb=46391KB/s, minb=46391KB/s, maxb=46391KB/s, mint=60005msec, maxt=60005msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sda: ios=144/695071, merge=0/1527, ticks=72/53368, in_queue=53744, util=81.91%
Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.957 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.952 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 1.019 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 1.063 sec Downloaded 104857600 bytes in 0.950 sec Finished! Average download speed is 809.55 Mbit/s
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from Hetzner ... Selecting 15 servers that are not too close: 1. Onlime GmbH (Aerzen) [83.89 km]: 114.741 ms 2. IT Ohlendorf (Salzgitter) [111.93 km]: 15.212 ms 3. Hanne & Fomenko GbR (Salzgitter) [111.93 km]: 16.078 ms 4. Newone (Ilmenau) [120.64 km]: 12.765 ms 5. Thueringer Netkom GmbH (Weimar) [132.12 km]: 17.549 ms 6. Vodafone DE (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 9.29 ms 7. LWLcom GmbH (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 10.669 ms 8. DEAC (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 46.828 ms 9. LeaseWeb (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 20.514 ms 10. Interoute VDC (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 11.093 ms 11. IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 8.646 ms 12. Jublo Solutions (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 51.836 ms 13. ShadowGaming (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 33.601 ms 14. 23media GmbH (Frankfurt) [143.27 km]: 7.513 ms 15. MBN (Frankfurt) [143.90 km]: 12.352 ms Testing upload speeds 1. Onlime GmbH (Aerzen): ......................... 21.04 Mbit/s 2. IT Ohlendorf (Salzgitter): ......................... 125.16 Mbit/s 3. Hanne & Fomenko GbR (Salzgitter): ......................... 233.48 Mbit/s 4. Newone (Ilmenau): ......................... 192.81 Mbit/s 5. Thueringer Netkom GmbH (Weimar): ......................... 312.39 Mbit/s 6. Vodafone DE (Frankfurt): ......................... 456.49 Mbit/s 7. LWLcom GmbH (Frankfurt): ......................... 430.40 Mbit/s 8. DEAC (Frankfurt): ......................... 135.79 Mbit/s 9. LeaseWeb (Frankfurt): ......................... 484.69 Mbit/s 10. Interoute VDC (Frankfurt): ......................... 588.74 Mbit/s 11. IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG (Frankfurt): ......................... 613.47 Mbit/s 12. Jublo Solutions (Frankfurt): ......................... 216.27 Mbit/s 13. ShadowGaming (Frankfurt): ......................... 126.08 Mbit/s 14. 23media GmbH (Frankfurt): ......................... 528.20 Mbit/s 15. MBN (Frankfurt): ......................... 111.28 Mbit/s Average upload speed is 305.09 Mbit/s